|
Spring
2005
American Chestnut Tree Propagation Updates
continued
Pocket Tree Information from the log
of Chapter members: Tom Pachinger and Ken McDonald |
| |
Continued from Pollination Updates |
| June 16, 2005
The Glassy Mountain site has no flowering
trees this year. Today the tree at Joe's house was inspected and
it will not bloom. A meeting was held with the Tallulah
District of the FS regarding a time to daylight around the Glassy
trees. A field trip to Glassy Mountain made it clear that cutting
trees about three inches in diameter or less to give light to the
chestnuts will greatly help the situation. This work should begin
in July. Jack Johnston
|
| June 13, 2005
Monday was a good day, and an exciting day!!!! Hill
Craddock was very excited about the Pocket trees. His opinion
is that they all fall well
within the American Chestnut variation range. Of all the trees we
looked at-NONE fell outside this range (Dr Craddock). However, I know
Fred Hebard is extremely knowledgeable and the one leaf sample (one
of the 80 plus trees at this site) sent to him, under story leaves
from site # 7- he called Chinkapin. Whether the trees are Chinkapin
or Chestnut is going to be debated for some time and I don't expect
we'll have a definitive answer for some time.
The variation in these trees is
tremendous- chestnut? japenese/american cross? american/chinkapin
cross? what ever. What makes it difficult also-we have burs with 3
nuts-American, and the burs on the dead tree had 1 nut per
bur-Chinkapin. Shade leaves look Chinkapin-ish-But leaves on the same
trees in the sun light look American. The flowers Mike and I bagged
Saturday, I believe were Chinkapin in form-not having 3
rosettes per bud, [Chestnut] but having only one [Chinkapin].
I know Hill is very excited about the site and the
trees-either way-the lost Japanese American cross'-that's another
story-or a natural cross between Chinkapin and Chestnut. Hill
talked about an extinct species of Chestnut that was so described as
a cross between Chinkapin and
American Chestnut. Anyway Dr Craddock wanted to pollinate with
Chestnut pollen, and if he and Fred can't come to a consensus, we can
pollinate some Chinkapin and some Chestnut-[Bendabout Pollen].
Realize we may have missed the opportune time to pollinate
these.......either way.
NOW for the REALLY EXCITING NEWS!!!!!! Lisa Worthen, Hill's graduate
student, discovered a beautiful tree on top Johns Mountain
overlook, about 2-4 miles from the pocket. I think we should
refer to this as the Worthen Look See Tree.
It is six to eight inches in diameter at four foot from the
ground, 40-45' high and shows no sign of blight at this time.
Ken McDonald stands by Worthen Look See Tree Dr Craddock and his fungus
graduate student looked hard for any signs of blight and could not
find any. The tree has already desissed -meaning released it's
pollen - so we'll have to wait and pray we can
get this tree pollinated next year.
And finally-Ken and I visited the Carl Meyer Tree Sunday-it shows
little change since our last visit. David Keehn and Hill Craddock
agreed to let Hill pollinate both the pocket trees and the Carl Meyer
tree when the time is right. Pocket trees should be Wed or Thursday.
|
| June 9, 2005
Folks-Ken and I (Tom Pachinger) visited Carl
Meyer tree as promised last night. Pictures of tree enclosed.
Catkins on
Meyers Tree remind Ken and I of how Pocket trees looked May 29th. My
guess is early to mid week tree will need emasculating-you experts
please jump in here with your years of experience. We could not see
any bi-sexual catkins on the Meyers Tree-however-difficult at best
thru a pair of binoculars looking high up in this tree.
|
| June 8, 2005
Pictures from last night at the Pocket. On two
different trees, we found one small spot on each of the two tree's
where anthers of catkins are mature to point we believe they are
covered with pollen, and numerous insects then on the these two
groups of catkins. Ken and I were on site two hours really examining
the catkins for bi-sexual catkins, we saw none, we see no female
flowers, no separation of nodules along the catkins base, and again
no females spotted. Tom |
| June 8, 2005
I do not expect flowering on Glassy Mountain
this year due to cutting of trees done by the FS that were of
blooming size "so they can land their helicopter." There are
about 200 trees there that need light. Blight is quite evident on
Glassy. Am watching a tree on a private drive to see if it flowers.
- Jack Johnston
|
| June 6, 2005
Today I [Mark Stallings} went out with Paul
Sisco, who came down from Greensboro for the occasion with two
assistants. We visited the "Thomas Fowler" tree and he made
plans for pollination. Again, this is a large tree, and Paul
thought it would be ready in a week or ten days.
We took a stroll through the woods, and found a
large number of American Chestnut trees of various sizes (I
estimate from dozens to a few hundred; we did not walk the entire
area, but we did move around quite a bit). There were no
indications of them being crossed with other species, as the leaves
all showed classic American Chestnut characters. Paul thinks we'll
be able to get a good number of nuts from the larger tree. This is
also a good location for a scientific study, and would certainly be
a good spot to add to our leaf collection for variety. It's at
about 3200 feet, more or less, and would also be a great spot to
hold a meeting for our membership. We had a good day. If it
all works, we'll have some high quality Georgia genetics to add to
the pot...
|
| June 1, 2005 Hill Craddock and I visited Carl
Meyer's tree at Chestnut Flats, GA, yesterday. It's a nice tree
-- about 30' tall, and Carl
has cleared around
the base so a bucket truck can get in to it.
The catkins were still immature, and we could not see any female
flowers yet. Hill and I estimated that it would not need bagging for
about a week. Then pollination would be about 10 days after that --
perhaps around June 17.
At the Chestnut Flat Grocery where we stopped for lunch, we met Rusty
Alexander of Alexander Splicing and Tree Service, who said he could
provide a bucket truck for pollination. His cell phone number is
...........
We plan to be at the GA chapter meeting at "The Pocket" on Saturday.

Paul H. Sisco, Ph.D.
Regional Science Coordinator
The American Chestnut Foundation
Southern Appalachian Regional Office
 |
| May 31, 2005 Pocket Trees
Your pictures are good. It looks like that tree might be ready to
bag later this week or this weekend. However, this is a rough guess
based
on the size of the male catkins. If you had some pictures of
bisexual catkins, that could have given a much more accurate
assessment of when
the tree will be ready to bag. Generally, when the female flowers
are about the size of a pea, a tree is ready. More specifically, I
look for the beginning of emergence of styles as the prime time to
bag a tree. I've attached a photo.
Note also that the male flowers have turned a
creamy yellow in my photo, whereas the catkins in your photos are
still mostly green. But again, relying on the male catkins gives you
only a rough idea. The styles are quite reliable. Here is a
picture of what to look for. [The female floret is at the base
of the catkin - a few antlers have begun to emerge are on the male
catkin)
The catkins at the top of a tree often will start
to bloom before catkins lower down in the crown. In my experience,
it is best to bag trees when the first few female flowers, usually in
the top of a tree, begin to exert styles, rather than wait on most
female flowers to start exerting styles, such as those lower in the
crown.

Frederick V. Hebard, PhD
Staff Pathologist, Meadowview Research Farms
American Chestnut Foundation |
| May 31, 2005 A quick message this morning-pictures
to follow later-I visited the Pocket trees Sunday May 29th.
It had been about a week since I had been on site. Catkins had grown
in length some, some new ones appear to have formed as well but there
was not a tremendous change from the last week. One exception would
be site #7 - here the catkins on the upper branches appear to be six
to seven inches long. I still see no female flowers anywhere,
however, on site #7 it is impossible to get close to these without a
ladder. A few catkins [ 6-12 ] were found broken off and just laying
on the branch leaves, also some catkins were seen where the ends had
turned brown and just the end broken off or still hanging on.
However, there are hundreds of catkins on these trees and only a
very small number were seen to exhibit the above mentioned
characteristics. I finished the release work Ken had started last
week on some newly discovered trees he had found, and found another
6-8 trees in the six to ten foot height range. Also a "giant" dead
tree's skeletal remains were found...approx. 30' tall with a five to
six inch diameter trunk, it also showed signs of a fire scar.
For the second time in a row I brought back some
hitchhikers with me from my visit - ticks, and I mention this
so folks can be prepared. Folks also need to be aware this is a very
thick under storied area, with a lot of competition going on for the
light created when the hurricane went thru. Mike, Ken, Don and I have
been able to release around these trees but the areas between trees
are thick with vegetation, and keeping the new growth down around the
trees is an ongoing process. We do not go into the site with out
snake leggings, and we have seen snakes on two different occasions.
The walk to the ridge crest is fairly open forest, but once you go
over the ridge and onto the site this changes dramatically to more of
a cut over area 3 to 5 years old. We plan to send one more update
before the weekend and hope to knock under story back one more time
before visitors arrive. A note here, there are 3-5 trees, much closer
to the trail, one or two with catkins that might be a good
alternative for the visitors who come to join the Chapter and are in
shorts and tennis shoes.
TOM
PS-I was on vacation last week walking 70 miles of
the Appalachian trail, coming out at US 76 just east of Hiawassee,
Ga. I saw literally 100's of
chestnut trees along the trail, mostly 6-10 ft, a dozen or more
18-24', and one giant 35' or better that unfortunately was showing
signs of blight right at the base. The trees at the higher elevations
were very much more single trunk, and usually the bigger trees were
at the higher elevations, or the dead remains were of a larger sized
tree, for example a 6-8" diameter tree (dead) on the north side of
Standing Indian Mountain, NC. I also observed that some of these
chestnuts growing at the higher elevations also had grown around a
canker or two and were still living.
|
| May 26, 2005 Pocket Trees
Not much change from last Sunday. The
catkins are larger and there are quite a few more small one's have
just emerged...None that looked like the pictures of the bi-sexual
catkins. Three more trees, one of which has catkins...Some release
work done before running out of daylight |
| May 19, 2005 Pocket Trees
The overall feel we got was that the
catkin size is larger but not a big change from the last visit. An
inventory of the number of notable trees in the area was taken in
order to give everyone a better idea of what we're dealing with...it
is really an amazing site.
We have twelve areas marked with numbered stakes. "Tree"
refers to clumps of stump sprouts, two or more stems per tree:
- one tree...frost damage...a few catkins
- two trees... one with a few small catkins
visible, one with
numerous catkins 1-3" long
- two trees...very large number of catkins on both
- two trees...no catkins
- three trees...some dead stems...no catkins
- one tree...frost damaged...no catkins
- two trees...both with numerous catkins 3 to 3
1/2" long
- eighteen trees...thirteen with catkins in
varying degrees
- five with no catkins
- two with bad frost damage
- one tree...several catkins in top portion
- three trees...no catkins
- four trees...three with catkins
- two trees...thirty foot tall tree mostly
dead...no catkins
* unmarked spot near #1 one tree...several small catkins
* 100 yards farther down ridge...eight trees...two with catkins
* next ridge over...seven trees...no catkins
* 1/2 mile around hiking trail...three trees...haven't checked in
about a month
If my math is correct, that's sixty trees we know about...twenty
seven of
which have catkins. I think this is going to get interesting...
|
May 17, 2005
Pocket Trees
There are-15-40 chestnut trees in the Pocket, spread over 1 3/4 to
2 1/2 acres of land, this is at least 15-20 separate trees (our
opinion), [not trees close enough to be from the same stump
sprout], of these at least 8-12 are currently putting out catkins.
We have cleared around these trees; we have fertilized these trees
from last fall-every month, we've mud wrapped suspicious looking
trunks, we've done everything we've known to do...to get to this
point
And yet every time we have time to
"explore" we seem to find more trees-Ken found two trees putting on
catkins 100 yards from the next nearest tree already discovered
last Saturday.
We have seen
several trees not survive this past winter-one of our largest
trees, nearly 30 ft tall, unfortunately is dead.
This could be our
one and only shot at pollinating these trees-I pray not-but I feel
we must act as if this were true. However many lines of trees we
ultimately end up with, could be the result of the nuts /blooms
we've saved this year off trees that may never live to bloom
again, yet their decedents will be saved, thru plantings of these
nuts to do just that
|
| May 16, 2005 Pocket Trees
Please see attached pictures...I was
at the pocket yesterday morning to fertilize some new trees I had
found on Saturday when I decided to check on the trees we already
knew about. I found a large number of trees with catkins ranging
from just barely visible to as much as 3 1/2" long. Tom and I
returned yesterday afternoon to get these pictures.
The trees with visible catkins range from 6' to 25' in height. Some
trees only have a few catkins visible in the very top portions of
the trees and some are literally covered with catkins on almost every
limb. There are also some quite large trees with no catkins at
all...most of these are very close to stems that have apparently
died.


|
|